Viewing entries tagged
credit-bureaus-reach-settlement-agreement-with-ny-ag-office

A New Report for Liens and Judgments

Comment

A New Report for Liens and Judgments

As a follower of the HOPE4USA Credit Blog you are already aware of the massive credit reporting changes which are on the horizon. The 3 credit reporting agencies have announced that on July 1, 2017 they will be removing the vast majority of judgments and about half of the tax liens from their consumer credit reports in an effort to comply with the National Consumer Assistance Plan (NCAP). (You can read more about that announcement and what it means for consumers here.)

The removal of so much negative public record information is slated to quickly improve the credit scores of millions of Americans. Many consumers are understandably excited about the forthcoming credit reporting changes. Lenders, however, have been much more apprehensive.

Why Lenders Are Nervous about the Change

The new credit reporting policy, greatly anticipated by many consumers, is actually quite worrisome for lenders. Lenders depend upon credit report data and, by extension, credit scores to help predict risk - the risk of doing business with new applicants. In order to remain profitable lenders cannot issue loans to people who are unlikely to pay back those loans plus the agreed upon interest according to the terms of their agreements.

Public records, like judgments and tax liens, on credit reports and the impact which those public records have upon a consumer's credit scores serve the purpose of helping lenders to predict risk more accurately. In other words, the data helps lenders be more profitable. Since lenders are in business to make a profit, just like everyone else, any tool which helps them to achieve that goal is greatly valued. The removal of so much tax lien and judgment data from credit reports will make an important lender tool (traditional credit reports and credit scores) much less effective.

According to LexisNexis, borrowers with a judgment or tax lien filed against them are twice as likely to default on a loan when compared to consumers without these challenges. Additionally, these same consumers are believed to be 5 and 1/2 times more likely to enter into pre-foreclosure or foreclosure when compared with borrowers who do not have judgment or tax lien records. If you can put yourself into a lender's shoes for a moment then you can understand how the sudden inability to access this predictive information would be unsettling.

Introducing LexisNexis RiskView Liens & Judgments Report

In answer to this newly created need in the lender marketplace, Innovis (sometimes referred to as the 4th national credit reporting agency) has announced a partnership with LexisNexis® Risk Solutions. The 2 companies will be combining their efforts and resources to offer the LexisNexis® RiskView Liens & Judgments Report.

According to LexisNexis the new product will offer lenders "uninterrupted access to...lien and civil judgment data." The new report is being advertised as 99% accurate, with a nationwide network of court runners delivering the most current public record data available. Furthermore, LexisNexis states that the new report, available in July of 2017, will be fully FCRA compliant and will feature a "robust dispute resolution process to help consumers report and correct inaccurate information." Of course, whether or not this so-called "robust" dispute process will improve upon the currently problematic dispute processes in place with most of the consumer reporting agencies remains to be seen. Regardless, the report is being marketed to lenders as a solution to fill the hole which will be left by the removal of so much public record data from traditional credit reports.

Significance for Consumers

At this point predictions are purely speculative of course, but chances are high that a significant number of lenders may choose to take advantage of the new RiskView Liens & Judgments Report. The report has the potential to improve a lender's ability to predict risk. As such, consumers who may have been anticipating that the removal of certain public record information from their credit reports might solve all of their problems may be in for a bit of a letdown. Yet the news is not all bad for consumers either as they will be able to look forward to all of the following:

  • Most judgments and about 1/2 of the tax liens are still going to be removed from the credit reports produced by Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian in July of 2017.
  • The removal of public record information could very likely result in a credit score increase. A consumer may need to pay off a public record in order to qualify for a loan (or for a number of other reasons) of course, but an increase in credit scores could still lead to a number of financial benefits.

To summarize, the removal of a judgment or tax lien is not going to suddenly erase all of a consumer's credit and financial problems, but it is still a small victory for the consumer nonetheless. Additionally, although the details have not yet been released, consumers should have access to a copy of this new liens and judgments report as well as a right afforded to them under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Once the reports are made available it would be wise to request and review your own report to monitor for the errors which are unfortunately far too common among consumer reports. 






charlotte-nc-credit-expert

Michelle Black is an author and leading credit expert with a decade and a half of experience, a recognized credit expert on talk shows and podcasts nationwide, and a regularly featured speaker at seminars across the country. She is an expert on improving credit scores, budgeting, and identity theft. You can connect with Michelle on the HOPE4USA Facebook page by clicking here.


Comment

Huge Changes Coming to a Credit Bureau Near You

Comment

Huge Changes Coming to a Credit Bureau Near You

Consumers can expect to see major changes in the way that the credit reporting agencies - Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian - handle much of the information on their credit reports and the consumer dispute process in the coming months and years. In fact these changes, brought about as part of a settlement agreement released on March 9, 2015, are so sweeping that they have the potential to lead to higher credit scores for millions of US consumers.  

The settlement came about after New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and his office began investigating the practices of the 3 credit reporting agencies in 2012. While the neither Equifax, TransUnion, nor Experian were actually found to have violated any laws, the 3 credit reporting giants have agreed to a settlement which will implement a very significant overhaul affecting many different credit reporting and consumer dispute policies.

Additionally, the changes will not merely apply to residents of the state of New York but rather will be implemented for consumers nationwide. Without question the settlement marks the most significant change in credit reporting since the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) in 2003.  In fact, credit reporting changes of the magnitude included in the settlement agreement generally only come about when mandated by federal law.

The lengthy settlement agreement (a whopping 41 pages long of not-so-light reading) details a massive amount of information regarding the credit reporting practices changes to come. Here are some of the most important highlights.

Time Frame

·        The changes detailed in the agreement will not take place overnight; however, they will be implemented nationwide over the next 6 to 39 months (3.25 years).

Medical Collections

·        According to the agreement unpaid medical collections will not be permitted to be added to a consumer's credit reports for a period of 180 days (approximately 6 months). The change is designed to prevent consumers from having unnecessary derogatory collection accounts added to their credit reports in cases where a medical insurance company is simply dragging its feet to pay a bill - a common occurrence.

·        When a medical collection is paid by an insurance company it must be removed from a consumer's credit reports immediately, regardless of how long it has been there. Previously paid medical collections were permitted to remain on a consumer's credit reports, leading to credit score damage, for 7 years from the date of default on the original account.

More Free Credit Reports for Consumers with Disputes

·        Each credit bureau has also agreed to provide an additional free credit report to consumers who file a dispute using an AnnualCreditReport.com credit report. Previously, as part of 2003's FACTA, consumers were only entitled to only one from credit report every 12 months via the same website.

Changes to the Dispute Process

·        Perhaps the biggest changes to come about as a result of the settlement are among those involved with the consumer dispute process.

¨      Refusing to Process Disputes - The credit bureaus are no longer permitted to refuse to accept a dispute due to the fact that a consumer has not receive a credit report recently nor for the failure of a consumer to include a credit report identification number with his/her dispute.

¨      Deceased Indicator Changes - When a credit bureau receives a dispute from a consumer than an account on his/her credit report is inaccurately reporting that the consumer is deceased (and the credit bureau's investigation has in fact revealed that the consumer's dispute has merit) the credit bureau must share the information regarding the incorrect "deceased indicator" with the other 2 credit bureaus so that they may remove the indicator as well. (These inaccurate deceased indicators often show up on a consumer's credit reports when they hold a joint account with someone who has passed away.)

¨      Review of Supporting Dispute Documentation Submitted by Consumers - Previously if a consumer filed a dispute with documented proof of a credit reporting inaccuracy the credit bureau would still rely upon the data furnisher (i.e. creditor or collection agency) to review the dispute and determine whether to verify or delete the account. Under the new agreement when a consumer includes documentation to support a dispute and the data furnisher verifies the account as accurate anyway the credit bureau will be required to assign an agent to perform its own investigation, independent of the data furnisher. If the credit bureau agent determines that the consumer's dispute is indeed valid then the agent will have the authority to modify or delete the disputed account.

¨      Escalated Dispute Handling - The credit bureaus will be required to process disputes occurring as a result of fraud, identity theft, and mixed credit files (where the files of 2 consumers are merged into 1) in an escalated manner. Escalated disputes will be handled by specialized groups with experience in these complex dispute situations. 






michelle-lambright-black-credit-expert

Michelle Black is leading credit expert with over 13 years of experience, the credit blogger at HOPE4USA.com, a recognized credit expert on talk shows and podcasts nationwide, and  a regularly featured speaker. She is an expert on credit reporting and scoring, budgeting, and identity theft.



Comment