A New Report for Liens and Judgments

Comment

A New Report for Liens and Judgments

As a follower of the HOPE4USA Credit Blog you are already aware of the massive credit reporting changes which are on the horizon. The 3 credit reporting agencies have announced that on July 1, 2017 they will be removing the vast majority of judgments and about half of the tax liens from their consumer credit reports in an effort to comply with the National Consumer Assistance Plan (NCAP). (You can read more about that announcement and what it means for consumers here.)

The removal of so much negative public record information is slated to quickly improve the credit scores of millions of Americans. Many consumers are understandably excited about the forthcoming credit reporting changes. Lenders, however, have been much more apprehensive.

Why Lenders Are Nervous about the Change

The new credit reporting policy, greatly anticipated by many consumers, is actually quite worrisome for lenders. Lenders depend upon credit report data and, by extension, credit scores to help predict risk - the risk of doing business with new applicants. In order to remain profitable lenders cannot issue loans to people who are unlikely to pay back those loans plus the agreed upon interest according to the terms of their agreements.

Public records, like judgments and tax liens, on credit reports and the impact which those public records have upon a consumer's credit scores serve the purpose of helping lenders to predict risk more accurately. In other words, the data helps lenders be more profitable. Since lenders are in business to make a profit, just like everyone else, any tool which helps them to achieve that goal is greatly valued. The removal of so much tax lien and judgment data from credit reports will make an important lender tool (traditional credit reports and credit scores) much less effective.

According to LexisNexis, borrowers with a judgment or tax lien filed against them are twice as likely to default on a loan when compared to consumers without these challenges. Additionally, these same consumers are believed to be 5 and 1/2 times more likely to enter into pre-foreclosure or foreclosure when compared with borrowers who do not have judgment or tax lien records. If you can put yourself into a lender's shoes for a moment then you can understand how the sudden inability to access this predictive information would be unsettling.

Introducing LexisNexis RiskView Liens & Judgments Report

In answer to this newly created need in the lender marketplace, Innovis (sometimes referred to as the 4th national credit reporting agency) has announced a partnership with LexisNexis® Risk Solutions. The 2 companies will be combining their efforts and resources to offer the LexisNexis® RiskView Liens & Judgments Report.

According to LexisNexis the new product will offer lenders "uninterrupted access to...lien and civil judgment data." The new report is being advertised as 99% accurate, with a nationwide network of court runners delivering the most current public record data available. Furthermore, LexisNexis states that the new report, available in July of 2017, will be fully FCRA compliant and will feature a "robust dispute resolution process to help consumers report and correct inaccurate information." Of course, whether or not this so-called "robust" dispute process will improve upon the currently problematic dispute processes in place with most of the consumer reporting agencies remains to be seen. Regardless, the report is being marketed to lenders as a solution to fill the hole which will be left by the removal of so much public record data from traditional credit reports.

Significance for Consumers

At this point predictions are purely speculative of course, but chances are high that a significant number of lenders may choose to take advantage of the new RiskView Liens & Judgments Report. The report has the potential to improve a lender's ability to predict risk. As such, consumers who may have been anticipating that the removal of certain public record information from their credit reports might solve all of their problems may be in for a bit of a letdown. Yet the news is not all bad for consumers either as they will be able to look forward to all of the following:

  • Most judgments and about 1/2 of the tax liens are still going to be removed from the credit reports produced by Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian in July of 2017.
  • The removal of public record information could very likely result in a credit score increase. A consumer may need to pay off a public record in order to qualify for a loan (or for a number of other reasons) of course, but an increase in credit scores could still lead to a number of financial benefits.

To summarize, the removal of a judgment or tax lien is not going to suddenly erase all of a consumer's credit and financial problems, but it is still a small victory for the consumer nonetheless. Additionally, although the details have not yet been released, consumers should have access to a copy of this new liens and judgments report as well as a right afforded to them under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Once the reports are made available it would be wise to request and review your own report to monitor for the errors which are unfortunately far too common among consumer reports. 






charlotte-nc-credit-expert

Michelle Black is an author and leading credit expert with a decade and a half of experience, a recognized credit expert on talk shows and podcasts nationwide, and a regularly featured speaker at seminars across the country. She is an expert on improving credit scores, budgeting, and identity theft. You can connect with Michelle on the HOPE4USA Facebook page by clicking here.


Comment

The Newest Credit Scoring Model: VantageScore 4.0

Comment

The Newest Credit Scoring Model: VantageScore 4.0

To many people, FICO is king when it comes to credit scoring models. The majority of lenders, most notably those in the mortgage industry, rely either exclusively or at least heavily upon FICO scores as they evaluate the credit worthiness of new applicants for financing. However, with the introduction of VantageScore 4.0 in the fall of 2017 many lenders are starting to pay a bit more attention to this newest arrival to the world of credit scoring.

In truth, VantageScore Solutions (the company which creates and sells VantageScore credit scores) is not so new. It is only new when compared with the Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). VantageScore Solutions, founded by the 3 major credit reporting agencies themselves in 2006, is actually over a decade old. 

Yet most lenders still prefer FICO scores. FICO was initially founded in 1956 and created its first credit scoring system in 1958. The credit bureaus themselves began to adopt FICO credit bureau risk scores between 1981 (Equifax) and 1991. According to FICO its scores are currently used by 95% of the largest financial institutions in the country.

VantageScore 4.0

Though the company is already dominate in direct-to-consumer credit score sales, VantageScore Solutions has been fighting for over a decade to dip further and further into FICO's lender-purchased credit score market share. This goal is achieved by convincing more and more lenders to purchase VantageScore's credit scores to use for risk analysis in prospecting, account management, and application reviews. The roll out of the 4th generation of its scoring model in the fall of 2017 will be just one more step toward this goal, but might be better described as a giant leap instead of a step.

The reason the release of VantageScore 4.0 is such big news is because it will be the first credit scoring model to consider trended data in the calculation of consumer credit scores.  Trended data, added to credit reports several years ago, allows credit card issuers to report a 24 month history of historical balances and payment amounts made by their customers. This historical data can show future lenders whether you are truly someone who pays off your credit card balances in full each month (aka a transactor) or whether you are in the habit of revolving an outstanding balance from one month to the next (aka a revolver).

Revolvers, especially minimum payers (consumers who only pay the minimum payment due on their credit card bills) represent a higher level of risk to lenders. In fact, according to a study conducted by Experian, minimum payers are 6 times more likely to have a future delinquency than transactors. TransUnion's study on trended data found that revolvers represent between 3 to 5 times more risk than transactors.

Including trended data in VantageScore 4.0 gives this new scoring model increased predictive power over previous generations of VantageScore and, arguably, FICO scoring models as well. In other words, this new scoring model is being touted as a more reliable way to predict credit risk. Predicting risk, after all, is why lenders purchase credit scores in the first place.

Advice for Consumers

Because of recent changes in credit reporting, especially the upcoming removal of many tax liens and judgments from credit reports and the removal of many medical collections as well, lenders and credit score developers are going to begin paying more attention to alternative credit data which is also predictive. It has always been important to pay off your credit card balances in full each month both from a credit scoring perspective and also from a financial perspective as well. However, with the consideration of trended data now in the works the importance of paying off your credit card balances has multiplied exponentially.

Of course implementing a new credit scoring model is very expensive for lenders. Due to the high cost it will likely be years before a majority of lenders begin using VantageScore 4.0. The same can be assumed for any yet unannounced but potentially forthcoming new releases from FICO which consider trended data for that matter.

As a result consumers do not necessarily have to worry about trended data impacting their credit scores for a while. Still, remember that when credit scoring models which consider trended data are finally adopted by lenders those models will be looking back at a 24 month history of your credit card payments. This means that the time to develop the habit of paying off your credit card balances monthly is now.

 





michelle-black-credit-expert

Michelle Black is an author and leading credit expert with over a decade and a half of experience, a recognized credit expert on talk shows and podcasts nationwide, and a regularly featured speaker at seminars across the country. She is an expert on improving credit scores, budgeting, and identity theft. You can connect with Michelle on the HOPE4USA Facebook page by clicking here.


Comment

Coming Soon: A New Credit Score Boost for Millions of Americans

Comment

Coming Soon: A New Credit Score Boost for Millions of Americans

Arguably the biggest change to impact credit reporting (and by extension credit scoring) in decades will be going into effect within just a few months. In July of 2017 the 3 major credit reporting agencies (CRAs) - Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian - have announced that they will remove a significant number of the tax liens and judgments which are currently appearing on consumer credit reports. The pending removal of these derogatory public records could potentially boost credit scores for millions of Americans.

Reasons Behind the Change

There is nothing illegal about a credit reporting agency placing a judgment or a tax lien on your credit reports as long as they comply with the law. Of course if incorrect information is reported (i.e. wrong balance, incorrect dates, a public record which is not yours) that is another story all together.

It is important to understand that the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) absolutely allows for certain types of accurate public record information to appear on credit reports. Judgments have an FCRA requirement to be removed after 7 years and paid tax liens fall under the same 7 year removal requirement. According to the FCRA unpaid tax liens never have to be removed from credit reports, making them currently one of the most difficult credit problems for a consumer to overcome. However, in July this previously massive credit reporting problem is going to simply vanish from the credit reports of many American consumers.

As already mentioned, there is no FCRA requirement to remove public records such as tax liens or judgments from credit reports unless they have been reporting longer than is legally allowed. What then would prompt such a massive change in credit reporting procedure by Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian? The answer is regulatory concerns.

According to a statement released by the Consumer Data Industry Association (the trade organization of the credit reporting agencies), interim president Eric Ellman attributes the changes in credit reporting procedures as being part of the National Consumer Assistance Plan (NCAP). The NCAP was created after the 2016 settlement between the CRAs and 31 different state attorneys general. (Initially the settlement was reached between the CRAs and the New York Attorney General. You can read more about that first settlement here.)

Per Ellman, as a result of the NCAP the credit reporting agencies " have developed enhanced public record data standards for the collection and timely updating of civil judgments and tax liens." These new standards include a requirement for "a minimum of consumer personal identifying information (PII)" such as a consumer's name, address, social security number and/or date of birth to be verified in order to include public record information on a consumer's credit reports. Additionally, a minimum frequency of courthouse visits (specifically at least every 90 days) to update public record information is required under the NCAP. Most of the tax liens and judgments currently appearing on consumer credit reports do not meet these standards set forth in the NCAP and, as a result, will be removed from credit reports altogether in a few short months.  

What the Change Means for Consumers and Lenders

FICO credit scores, the chief credit score brand currently used by most lenders, are designed to consider public records such as tax liens and judgments whenever a consumer's credit scores are calculated. When the aforementioned public records are present a consumer's credit scores are normally impacted negatively. As a result, when the CRAs remove a public record (or multiple public records) from a consumer's credit reports the consumer's credit scores are almost certain to move upward, perhaps significantly. Translation: up to 12 million Americans could potentially see an immediate increase in their credit scores this summer when the majority of tax liens and judgments are removed from credit reports.


up to 12 million Americans could potentially see an immediate increase in their credit scores this summer when the majority of tax liens and judgments are removed from credit reports.

Lenders are understandably troubled regarding the pending change in credit reporting procedures when it comes to public records. After all, lenders rely heavily upon both credit reports and credit scores to predict the risk of doing business with new applicants. Removing tax liens and judgments from credit reports will lead to credit score increases for many consumers, making it more difficult for lenders to accurately evaluate the credit risk of new prospective customers.

Many consumers, on the other hand, are thrilled by the prospect of the upcoming change which could lead to higher credit scores. Of course it is important for these consumers to remember that the removal of a tax lien or judgment from a consumer's credit reports does not make the issue simply go away.

Consumers applying for a mortgage, for example, will probably not be off the hook when it comes to unresolved tax liens and judgments. Although a tax lien or judgment may no longer be appearing on the applicant's credit reports that does not mean that the items will not show up when the lender performs a public records search of its own. Lender requirements to pay outstanding judgments or tax liens (or at least enter into an acceptable payment plan) are not going to change because the public records may be removed from the credit reports. The removal of these items from credit reports could certainly help to bring about a credit score improvement, but that does not mean a legitimate judgment or tax lien would no longer be owed.







michelle-black-credit-expert

Michelle Black is an author and leading credit expert with a decade and a half of experience, a recognized credit expert on talk shows and podcasts nationwide, and a regularly featured speaker at seminars across the country. She is an expert on improving credit scores, budgeting, and identity theft. You can connect with Michelle on the HOPE4USA Facebook page by clicking here.


Comment

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Sues Navient

Comment

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Sues Navient

In one of its final moves under the former presidential administration, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed three separate lawsuits against the student loan servicing giant Navient. Navient currently services the student loans of over 12 million borrowers in the United States, loans which amount to over $300 billion in both federal and private student loan debt.

The student loans in question are not actually issued by Navient itself. Instead the company collects the payments on some 12 million loans on behalf of the US Department of Education, numerous private banks, and other lenders as well. There are 9 total student loan services currently under contract with the US Department of Education, but Navient is the largest servicer. In fact, nearly 25% (1 in 4) of student loan borrowers currently have Navient as their loan servicer.

The Allegations

According to the CFPB Navient failed student loan borrowers and repeatedly cheated many of them out of their rights to lower payments. Richard Cordray, director of the federal watchdog agency, alleged in the CFPB's statement that "For years, Navient failed consumers who counted on the company to help give them a fair chance to pay back their student loans. At every stage of repayment, Navient chose to shortcut and deceive consumers to save on operating costs. Too many borrowers paid more for their loans because Navient illegally cheated them and today's action seeks to hold them accountable."

Additionally, the CFPB took issue with Navient's alleged tendency to direct borrowers toward forbearance when financial troubles arose instead of reviewing income-based repayment options. When a borrower takes out a forbearance of their student loan the interest charges on the debt continue to accrue even while payments are not actively being made. The result? An additional $4 billion in interest charges were added on top of the principal loan balances of the Navient-serviced borrowers who enrolled in multiple and concurrent forbearances between January 2010 - March 2015.

Navient's Version of the Story

Navient, of course, has a very different side of the story to tell. The company vehemently denies any wrongdoing whatsoever and plans to fight the CFPB's allegations.

According to Navient the CFPB actually issued an ultimatum to the company to settle by Inauguration Day or be faced with multiple lawsuits. In a press release the company stated that "Navient rejects CFPB ultimatum to settle by Inauguration Day or be sued. The allegations of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are unfounded, and the timing of this lawsuit—midnight action filed on the eve of a new administration—reflects their political motivations."

In addition to allegations of the CFPB suing as a result of political motivations, Navient also maintained that the federal agency was trying to apply newly updated student loan servicing standards to Navient's past dealings with borrowers. In the aforementioned press release Navient stated that the company  "welcomes clear and well-designed guidelines that all parties can follow, and [they] had hoped [their] extensive engagement with the regulators would achieve this objective. Instead, the suit improperly seeks to impose penalties on Navient based on new servicing standards applied retroactively and applied only against one servicer. The regulator-asserted standards are inconsistent with Department of Education regulations, and will harm student-loan borrowers, including through higher defaults."

Finally, in response to the allegations that Navient pushed borrowers toward forbearance options in lieu of income-based repayment options, the company pointed out that nearly half (49% to be exact) "of loan balances serviced by Navient for the federal government are enrolled in income-driven repayment plans," and that "assertions that we do not educate borrowers about IDR plans ignore the facts."





michelle-black-credit-expert

Michelle Black is an author and leading credit expert with a decade and a half of experience, a recognized credit expert on talk shows and podcasts nationwide, and a regularly featured speaker at seminars across the country. She is an expert on improving credit scores, budgeting, and identity theft. You can connect with Michelle on the HOPE4USA Facebook page by clicking here.


Comment

Why Your Credit Card Doesn't Show the Current Balance On Your Credit Reports

Comment

Why Your Credit Card Doesn't Show the Current Balance On Your Credit Reports

Do you check your credit reports and scores often, perhaps even monthly? If so, kudos to you on developing a wonderful and wise habit, one which has the potential to really pay off in the future. One of the best ways to achieve and maintain great credit is to monitor your reports and scores closely.

If you do check your credit often then you have probably also become aware of a rather frustrating and puzzling fact when it comes to how your credit card balances appear on your credit reports. Unfortunately, the current balance on your credit card account will generally not line up exactly with the balance which is reflected on your credit reports. Believe it or not, while these mismatched balances can certainly be frustrating, these discrepancies are probably not due to a credit reporting error.

Say Cheese

The balances which are reported by your card issuers to the credit bureaus do not actually represent the real-time activity which takes place on your accounts. In other words, your credit reports will not show an updated balance every time you make a new charge or even when you make a payment. Instead, credit reporting works quite a bit differently.

Your card issuer will actually update the information on your credit reports just once a month. This update occurs shortly after your statement closing date when your card issuer will send a snapshot of your balance and payment information as it is currently reflected on your account at that moment. That snapshot of your balance and other account activity will remain on your credit reports until the information is replaced with a new snapshot the following month.

What Is the Statement Closing Date?

The statement closing date on your credit card account is the date when your bill for the previous month is closed out. It signals the end of your current billing cycle and is also the day when your payment due date is set. Generally the due date will be scheduled for around 25 days after the statement closing date, depending upon your card issuer's policies. If you make any charges after your statement closing date those new charges will be added to the following monthly statement.

It is important to find out your statement closing date from your credit card issuer since this date (or very soon thereafter) is when your balance will be updated with the credit bureaus. Whatever your balance is on your statement closing date (or very soon thereafter) it will remain as such on your credit reports for the next month.

A Zero Balance On Your Credit Reports

Your revolving utilization (aka credit utilization) is a big deal when it comes to your credit scores. Credit scoring models are designed to reward consumers who have zero balances on their credit card accounts. However, even if you pay off your credit cards in full each month (kudos again on a great habit) your credit scores might not be benefiting from that commitment and discipline. 

Here is an example to demonstrate why simply paying your credit card accounts off in full each month may not be enough to earn the great credit scores you desire.

·        Total Credit Card Balance on Statement Closing Date (5th of the Month): $1,500

·        Credit Utilization on Statement Closing Date (5th of the Month): 75% ($1,500 Balance/$2,000 Limit = 75% Utilization Ratio)

·        Date Balance and Utilization Reported to 3 Credit Bureaus: 6th of the Month

·        Date Current Balance Paid In Full: 30th of the Month (Due Date)

·        Balance to Appear on Credit Reports Until 6th of the Following Month: $1,500 (75% Utilized)

In the example above even though the credit card balance was ultimately paid in full on the due date and, therefore, no interest fees were owed, the balance which would show up on the consumer's credit reports would be the one which was accurate on the statement closing date ($1,500 in this case). Since that balance leaves the cardholder heavily utilized (75%), there would almost certainly be a negative impact upon the cardholder's credit scores as a result, even though no late payments were made and even though the balance was actually paid in full by the due date. If the card holder continued to utilize the card and pay it off on the due date each month then this credit-score-damaging cycle would continue to repeat over and over again.

A Better Way to Pay

The good news is that your statement closing date is not a secret and by paying off your balance in full a few days prior to that date your card issuer should report a $0 balance to the credit bureaus on your account. You can typically find your statement closing date on your credit card statement or you can give the card issuer's customer service department a call for this information as well. Once you find out your statement closing date you will simply need to rearrange the date when you pay off your credit card balance each month.

By paying off your credit card balance each month a few days prior to your statement closing date your balance will actually be $0 when your monthly statement is released. As a result, the balance on your credit reports for the following month should be reported as $0 as well.  This wise practice will not only help to save you money which might otherwise be wasted in interest charges, but you will also be setting yourself up for a credit score triumph as well.

 







michelle-black-credit-expert

Michelle Black is an author and leading credit expert with nearly a decade and a half of experience, a recognized credit expert on talk shows and podcasts nationwide, and a regularly featured speaker at seminars across the country. She is an expert on improving credit scores, budgeting, and identity theft. You can connect with Michelle on the HOPE4USA Facebook page by clicking here.


Comment